SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 629

K.SREEDHAR RAO
YELLAPPA – Appellant
Versus
YASHODA BAI – Respondent


Advocates:
K.B.Adhyapak

SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) WITH utter dismay I find that the pleadings filed by the parties at the time of filing of the suit and in the subsequent stages like appeal and revisions, there is no faithful and scrupulous observance of the provision of Order 6 Rule 14-A.

( 2 ) FOR convenient reference, the provisions are extracted hereunder: 14-A Address for service of notice - (1) Every pleading, when filed by a party, shall be accompanied by a statement in the prescribed form, signed as provided in Rule 14, regarding the address of the party. (2) Such address may, from time to time be changed by lodging in Court form duly filled up and stating the new address of the party and accompanied by a verified petition. (3) The address furnished in the statement made under sub-rule 91 shall be called the "registered address" of the party, and shall, until duly changed as aforesaid, be deemed to be the address of the party for the purpose of service of all processes in the suit or in any appeal from any decree or order therein made and for the purpose of execution, and shall hold good, subject as aforesaid, for a period of two years after the final determination of the cause or matter. (4) Service






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top