( 1 ) E stream of administration of justice has to remain unpolluted so that purity of Courts atmosphere may give vitality to all the organs of the State. The polluters of judicial firmament are therefore, required to be well taken care of to maintain sublimity of Courts environment; so also to enable to administer justice fairly and to the satisfaction of all concerned.

( 2 ) ANY one who takes recourse to fraud, deflects course of judicial proceedings, or if anything is done with oblique motive, the same amounts to interference with the administration of justice. As such the persons are required to be properly dealt with, not only to punish them for the wrong done, but also to deter others from indulging in similar activity, which tends to shake the faith of the people in the system of administration of justice. Thus are the observations of the Honble Supreme Court made in cases bineet Kumar Singh, In Re (2001) 5 SCC 501: (2001 Crilj2575 : AIR 2001 SC2018); chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma (1995) 1 SCC 421 : (1994 AIR SCW 4994); dhananjaya Sharma v. State of Haryana, (AIR 1995 SC 1795 ).

( 3 ) THE present suo motu registered case is also one of such instances wher