CHANDRASHEKARAIAH
NARASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BANGALORE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners in all these writ petitions are claiming to be the holders of an agreement executed by the landowners agreeing to sell certain lands in their favour for consideration. Before the performance of the contract as per the above said agreement by either of the parties, the lands in question were acquired by the State Government under the provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act. In view of this acquisition of the lands there cannot be any specific performance of the contract by the landowner even assuming that the petitioners were to file suits for specific performance of the contract.
( 2 ) THE Land Acquisition Officer, on the basis of the preliminary notification ssued under the above said enactment has passed an award determining the market value of the lands in question. Subsequent to the passing of the award, the petitioners have made application for reference under Section 30 read with Section 31 of the Land Acquisition act to the Civil Court claiming that they are also entitled for compensation as they have paid part of the consideration under the agreements of sale. Since no orders have been passed on their applicatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.