SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 714

K.SREEDHAR RAO
SANJEEVA NAIKA – Appellant
Versus
SHANKARA NARAYANA NAIKA – Respondent


Advocates:
H.R.SRIPADA, K.SRINIVAS MURTHY, M.NARAYANA BHAT, M.Ram Bhat, Subba Rao

K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 18-8-98 in r. A. No. 23/88 on the file of the II Addl. District Judge, Mangalore, D. K. , arising out of the Judgment and Decree dated 15-6-88 in O. S. No. 259/81 on the file of the II Addl. Civil Judge, Mangalore.

( 2 ) THE apellants are the defendant Nos. 4 and 15 before the trial Court. The first respondent filed a suit for partition and possession in the suit schedule properties consisting of agricultural lands and moveable properties. One Thimmanna Naika and the deceased first defendant are the parents of plaintiff and defendants 2 to 7. Defendants 8 to 10 are the L. Rs. and children of deceased defendant No. 3 and defendants 11 to 14 are the L. Rs. and children of deceased defendant No. 5.

( 3 ) DURING the lifetime of Thimmanna naika, there is a partition amongst thimmanna Naika and his sons, the suit properties were allotted to the share of thimmanna Naika. After his demise, the plaintiff claims a share in the suit properties. The contesting defendants are defendants 4 and 15, who are the father and son. During the lifetime of Thimmanna Naika, he executed a sale deed in favour of the 4th defe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top