BRANCH MANGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HAMZA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant-Insurance Company, on the ground that the details of the policy were furnished in the claim petition expressed its difficulty to admit its liability. It was also contended that the claimant did not possess a valid driving licence to drive the vehicle on the date of accident. However, during the course of evidence; the policy was produced by the claimant and marked as Ex. P4. As per the terms and conditions of the policy, the policy had come in to force from 5. 8. 1997 and was valid up to 4. 8. 1998. The second respondent/employer by paying premium on 4. 8. 1997 had obtained the policy on the same day. As per terms and conditions of Ex. P4, the policy would come into effect from 5. 8. 1997 and not from the date of payment of premium and issuance of policy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.