SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 759

BRANCH MANGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HAMZA – Respondent


( 1 ) IN this appeal the Insurance Company is challenging the liability saddled on it. The claimant-first respondent-Hamza sustained certain injuries in a road traffic accident on 4. 8. 1997, while driving an autorickshaw bearing No. CTX 9512, under the employment of second respondent. He presented a claim petition before the Commissioner claiming compensation under the provisions of Workmens Compensation Act.

( 2 ) THE appellant-Insurance Company, on the ground that the details of the policy were furnished in the claim petition expressed its difficulty to admit its liability. It was also contended that the claimant did not possess a valid driving licence to drive the vehicle on the date of accident. However, during the course of evidence; the policy was produced by the claimant and marked as Ex. P4. As per the terms and conditions of the policy, the policy had come in to force from 5. 8. 1997 and was valid up to 4. 8. 1998. The second respondent/employer by paying premium on 4. 8. 1997 had obtained the policy on the same day. As per terms and conditions of Ex. P4, the policy would come into effect from 5. 8. 1997 and not from the date of payment of premium and issuance of policy.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top