SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 746

V.G.SABHAHIT
C. G. AMANULLA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
ANWAR KHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Nalini Venkatesh, RAVINDRA REDDY, SOMNATH REDDY

V. G. SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by defendants in O. S. No. 92/1993 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Chickmagalur, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 11-6-1998.

( 2 ) THE essential facts of the case leading up to this appeal with reference to the rank of parties before the trial Court are as follows :the plaintiff filed the suit, O. S. No. 92/ 1993 on 26-8-1993 for partition of the suit schedule properties by metes and bounds and to deliver his 2/11th share in the schedule properties and for a direction to enquire into mesne profits from the date of suit till the date of realization. The suit schedule property comprises of 2 house properties situate in Chickmagalur. It is averred in the plaint that: the plaintiff and defendants are the children of Gulame Ghouse Khan (hereinafter referred to as "g. G. Khan"), who was working as a driver; he died on 27-9-1964 at Chickmagalur; G. G. Khan had married Smt. Khuthejabi of Kapu in south Canara District and out of the said wedlock of G. G. Khan and Smt. Khuthejabi, the plaintiff was born; after the death of the mother of the plaintiff Khuthejabi, G. G. Khan married Smt. Ayesha of Tumkur and she died within 15 days


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top