SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 811

STATE BY GANGAMMANAGUDI POLICE – Appellant
Versus
CHANNAIAH – Respondent


SALDANHA, J.

( 1 ) THE State Government has assailed the acquittal of accused 1 and 2 by the trial court on the ground that the chain of circumstances in this case leads to the irresistible conclusion, that accused 1 and 2 were the persons responsible for the murder of Channakeshava, whose body was found at Air Force Firing Range at Jalahalli, on the morning of 17-3-2001.

( 2 ) THE trial court after very elaborate analysis, first of the law and then of each of the circumstances, recorded a conclusion that the guilt of the accused said to have been not established and therefore acquitted them and the learned Addl. SPP, who appears in support of this appeal, had taken us through the record circumstance by circumstance. His submission is that the evidence conclusively establishes that the accused had taken substantial loan of Rs. 75,000/- from the deceased. When he had asked for repayment of the amount the situation got unpleasant and since the prosecution has established through evidence the nature of the transaction, that the motive for the murder stands established. All that we wish to add is that it could certainly provide a certain possible motive.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel then





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top