K. GOPALA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SURYANARAYANA – Respondent
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaint averments, one Neela Shetty son of Chikka Munisetty was the owner of the suit schedule property and that he gifted the property in the year 1975 in favour of the plaintiffs mother Pillamma and thereafter khata was changed in the name of Pillamma and that at present Khaneshmari number stands in the name of Pillamma. During the life time of Pillamma she was paying taxes to the plaint schedule property and that she had also obtained license from the village panchayat in order to put up a construction on the schedule property and that Pillamma died on 16. 12. 1983 leaving behind he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.