SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 961

V.GOPALA GOWDA
CHINNATHAMBI – Appellant
Versus
N. VEERAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Muni Venkatappa, N.R.Bhaskar, T.Sheshagiri Rao

V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT is tenant and defendant in the original suit. Respondents are trustees of Sri Hanuman Temple situated at Town, Bangalore and they are plaintiffs in the suit. For the sake of convenience, the rank of the parties are referred to as 'plaintiffs' and 'tenant'.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is preferred by the tenant against the judgment and decree dated 6-3-1999 passed by the Trial Court decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs and directing the tenant to handover vacant possession of the suit schedule property within two months.

( 3 ) THE suit schedule property belongs to the trust and the appellant herein is the tenant of the same. The plaintiffs filed suit in O. S. No. 10963 of 1994 against the tenant on the ground that the premises is required for the bona fide use and occupation of the of the temple. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the archak is residing far away from the temple and it is difficult for him to perform the poojas in the morning and evening and it is also difficult for him to prepare prasadam. Since the suit schedule premises is adjacent to the temple, the same is required to accommodate the Archak. The tenant resisted the suit taking various








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top