SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 1026

DARIS K. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
A. T. FRANCIS – Respondent


SALDANHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS case is very different from the character petitions that filed of are quashing of criminal proceedings before the lower courts in so far as it deals with an issue in very cruciial significance. The petitioners are husband wife and as will be presently illustrated, they are persons of status who come forward to undertake the cleansing of public life and improvement of the general quality of life. Inevitably, they have had deal with powerful anti socia1 elements underworld forces and familiar tactic has been used against them by way of threats and intimidation in Order to beat them down. The Courts have come across instances where human beings substance and of courage fight on, these attacks and pressures notwithstanding, and the basic issue, and one of very very deep seated significance has been arising in this case is whether the laws and the institutions that administer them are required to support, assist and redress and situation wherein litigation and Court cases are used as a weapon against them. It is a cruel joke when statements are made that the finest form of harassment and torture institute a Court proceeding against parties and drag them through t



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top