SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 999

RAM MOHAN REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANS. CORPN. – Appellant
Versus
SUNANDA – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK HARANAHAFLI, MALIKARJUN REDDY, S.MYLAR

RAM MOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE owner and insurer of the motor vehicle involved in the accident have preferred this appeal under section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') calling in question the judgment and award dated 14. 9. 2001 passed in M. V. C. No. 411 of 2000 on the file of the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. D) Addl. M. A. C. T. , Hubli (for short 'the M. A. C. T. ' ).

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are: on 1. 1. 2000, one Mahaveerappa Prathamashetty was travelling on the top of the bus belonging to the appellants along with his goods being tin sheets. When the bus reached K. E. B. Pole No. GDR 16 on hubli-Gadag Road, the driver of the bus applied brakes suddenly and the deceased fell down from the top of the bus and died instantaneously. The legal representatives of the deceased being the widow and the minor son, dependent on the income of the deceased, instituted a claim petition in m. V. C. No. 411 of 2000 seeking compensation.

( 3 ) THE appellants, on being notified by the M. A. C. T. , have appeared through their counsel and filed their objections denying the claim. The appellants, the respondents in the claim petition took a specific contention












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top