SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 37

RAM MOHAN REDDY
DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GUJJAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.SEETHA RAMA RAO, M.R.PATIL, RAJASHEKAR R.GUNJALLI

RAM MOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS miscellaneous first appeal under section 30 (1) (a) of the Workmen's Compensation Act is filed by the insurer, calling in question the correctness of the judgment and award dated 25. 1. 2002 passed in Case No. CWC: cr: 132 of 2001 by the Labour Officer and workmen's Compensation Commissioner, chitradurga (for short 'the Commissioner' ).

( 2 ) RELEVANT facts necessary for determination of this appeal are: one Nagaraja said to be aged 25 years employed by the respondent No. 4 herein, to work as a cleaner in the motor vehicle being a tipper bearing registration No. KA 16-5209 owned by the respondent No. 4 herein, while in the course of employment, sustained grievous injuries in an accident that occurred on 11. 7. 2001 at about 8. 30 p. m. involving a motor vehicle, while he was crossing the road near a dhaba at maderahalli. The deceased Nagaraja, it is claimed, was mowed down by the lorry bearing the registration No. TN 28-4668, driven at a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner. The legal heirs of the deceased Nagaraja, i. e. , respondent Nos. 1 to 3 being the mother, wife and minor son filed an application under section 22 of the workmen's Compe



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top