RAM MOHAN REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
SMT. B. V. NAGARATHNA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. BASANAGOUDA – Respondent
( 1 ) BOTH the Civil Revision Petitions are preferred by Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the common judgment and order dated 05th February, 2003 passed in Review Petition Nos. 55 of 2002 and 54 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Principal Civil Judge, Senior Division, and MACT, Raichur, for short, the MACT. Hence both the Civil Revision Petitions were clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) CIVIL Revision Petition No. 1217 of 2003 is directed against the judgment in Review Petition No. 55 of 2002 whereas Civil Revision Petition No. 1022 of 2003 is directed against the judgment in Review Petition No. 54 Of 2002. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are filed before this Court under Section 115 of CPC. Review Petition Nos. 54 and 55 of 2002 were preferred by the Insurance Company before the MACT under Order 457, Rule 1, CPC seeking review of the judgment and award passed in MVC No. 639 of 1998 and MVC No. 640 of 1998, allowing the claim petition of the respondent-herein filed under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for short, the Act for compensation on the ground that the awards were obtained by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.