SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 149

SRI. B. L. SRINIVASA GOWDA (HUF) – Appellant
Versus
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME -TAX – Respondent


( 1 ) I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned HCGP appearing for the respondents.

( 2 ) STATEMENT of objections has also been filed on behalf of the respondents.

( 3 ) IN these petitions a common question having been raised on behalf of the petitioners, these petitioners are disposed of by this common order.

( 4 ) PETITIONERS are assesses under the provisions of the Karnataka agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.

( 5 ) PETITIONER in W. P. No. 41114/03 filed his returns of agricultural income of for the assessment year 1996-1997 on 18. 3. 1998. This return the petitioner was required to file by 31. 7. 1996. On such return the Assessing Officer completed the assessment as per his order dated 16. 3. 1999 and the Assessing Officer on noticing that there was a delay in filing the return of income, proposed levy of interest under Section 18 (3) (A) of the Act. After according an opportunity to the assessee, by his order dated 31. 1. 2002 levied a sum of Rs. 81,764/- as interest payable by the assessee due to the delayed filing of his agricultural income and due to the delayed payment of tax.

( 6 ) LIKEWISE, the petitioner in W. P. No. 34039/2003 in respect of th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top