SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 216

RAM MOHAN REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
IRANNA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMADALI KHADARSAB MULLA – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S.Hosamath

RAM MOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN a bodily injury case, the injured, a minor represented by his father, natural guardian, being dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded, has preferred this appeal under section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'), calling in question the judgment and award dated 17. 9. 2002, passed in M. V. C. No. 1254 of 2000 on the file of the court of the Addl. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Saun-datti (for short 'm. A. C. T. ' ).

( 2 ) FACTS in brief, noticed, for decision making are: on 19. 4. 2000 at about 1345 hours, while Iranna, son of Basappa Kurahatti was walking on the left side of the road in Kasaba lane, near Jogannavar Complex on Nargund-Saundatti Road of Nargund town, the motor vehicle being a bus bearing registration No. KA 25-F 937, belonging to the respondent No. 2 and driven by the respondent No. 1 at a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner from Sankdal side dashed against the said Iranna. Due to the said accident, Iranna sustained grievous injuries resulting in amputation of his left leg below knee. The injured a student studying in 2nd standard, resident of Kurahatti, Ramdurg taluk of District belgaum























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top