SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 239

K.RAMANNA
THAMANNA SHIVALINGAPPA TELI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
H.G.Ramesh, RAVI B.NAIK, S.S.Koti

K. RAMANNA, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the revision petitions are directed against the common order of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Belgaum, dated 28-2-2002 in cri. A. Nos. 120 of 1996 and 122 of 2001 relating. to the delivery of the property.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that; Thammanna Shivalingappa teli, petitioner herein, lodged a complaint with the police stating that on 2-11-1985 gold articles were stolen from his house. The police took up investigation. One Appasaheb Chavan was arrested on 22-4-1986. Consequent upon the voluntary statement made by Appasaheb Chavan, several articles including gold ornaments were recovered from the possession of Ganeshmal Bhagwanji Rathod, 2nd respondent herein. When the properties were produced before the Court, the petitioner filed an application on 17-4-1989 for interim custody of the property, however, that application was not decided. On completion of investigation, the police filed charge-sheet against Appasaheb Chavan. The case was tried by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, athani, in C. C. No. 795 of 1986 for offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC and the accused was convicted.

( 3 ) THE gold ornaments were











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top