SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 220

RAM MOHAN REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
M. V. CHOWDAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN BREWERIES, DISTILLERIES LIMITED, PONDICHERY – Respondent


Advocates:
M.S.MANDANNA, Y.R.Sadashiva Reddy

S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE injured person in a motor vehicle accident, being dissatisfied with the compensation of Rs. 2,94,100/- with interest at 6% per annum, has preferred this appeal under Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act' ).

( 2 ) THE fact that the appellant sustained certain grievous injuries in the accident occurred on 27-3-1997 involving the motor vehicle owned by the 1st respondent and insured by the 2nd respondent-Insurance company is not in dispute. The appellant was 28 years of age on the date of the accident and according to him, he was earning monthly income of Rs, 5,000/- out of agriculture/sericulture and also by milk-vending. As per the medical evidence, he sustained 90% of permanent disability to the whole body. In the premise of these facts, the appellant claimed compensation of Rs. 8,00,000/ -.

( 3 ) THE claim petition was contested by the 2nd respondent-Insurance company by filing written statement. In support of the claim for compensation, the appellant examined himself as P. W. 1 and one Dr. Shanmugam as P. W. 3 and produced two wound certificates marked as exs. P. 7 and P. 8, discharge summary marked as Ex. P. 11 and certai















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top