SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 292

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, N.K.PATEL
A. MANAVALAGAN – Appellant
Versus
A. KRISHNAMURTHY – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M.VENKATESH, B.C.SEETHA RAMA RAO, G.V.BABU

( 1 ) THIS is a claimant's appeal against the judgment and award dated 15-9-1998 passed by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Chitradurga, in MVC No. 1397 of 1992.

( 2 ) WHEN the appellant and his wife Vijayakumari were proceeding in a car, from Goa to Bangalore, on 21-5-1992, a lorry bearing No. TN-28- 2853, coming from the opposite direction, being driven in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the car. As a result of the head-on collision, Vijayakumari sustained serious injuries. She was taken to a hospital at Davanagere and later to NIMHANS, Bangalore, where she died on the same day at about 10. 00 p. m. The appellant filed a claim petition claiming a compensation of Rs. 37,05,857. 00. The driver, owner and insurer of the lorry were impleaded as respondents 1, 2 and 3. The owner and insurer of the car were impleaded as respondents 4 and 5. The petition was resisted by respondents 2 to 5.

( 3 ) THE Tribunal framed appropriate issues regarding negligence of the driver of the lorry and driver of the car, entitlement of claimant of compensation and quantum of compensation. The appellant examined himself as P. W. 1 and examined an official from the college were the deceased w

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top