SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 284

S.R.NAYAK, K.RAMANNA
VENKATESH GURURAO KURATTI – Appellant
Versus
SYNDICATE BANK, MANIPAL – Respondent


Advocates:
DEEPAK DAVE, K.RADHESH PRABHU, M.S.PAI, TUKURAM S.PAL

PER S. R. NAYAK, J, J.

( 1 ) WRIT Appeal No. 7997 of 1999 preferred by the delinquent and cross-objections preferred by the Management of the Syndicate bank, are directed against the order of the learned single Judge of this Court dated June 14, 1999 passed in Writ Petition No. 12594 of 1991. In the Writ Petition, the delinquent questioned the correctness and legality of the action of the Management of the Syndicate bank removing him from service as a disciplinary measure on certain grounds of misconduct alleged to have been committed by the delinquent. Learned single Judge by the impugned order, allowed the writ petition in part, and, in substitution of the penalty of removal from service imposed by the management of the Syndicate Bank, imposed the reduced penalty of compulsory retirement as a measure of discipline. While doing so, learned single judge has observed that the delinquent is entitled for terminal benefits consequent upon imposition of punishment of compulsory retirement. Hence, the appeal by the delinquent complaining that the learned single Judge ought to have allowed the Writ petition in its entirety and quashed the disciplinary proceedings and the disciplinary actio





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top