SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 310

K.SREEDHAR RAO
H. MUTHUNANJAIAH – Appellant
Versus
C. G. INDIRAMMA (DECEASED) BY L. RS – Respondent


Advocates:
L.S.VARADARAJ IYENGAR, PADUBIDARI RAGHAVENDRA RAO

K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff filed the suit initially for a direction against the defendant to execute the sale deed by receiving a sum of Rs. 22,000/- on the ground of right of preemption. Later on, the plaintiff amended the plaint set up the agreement for sale dated 7-9-1984 and sought relief of specific performance.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that himself and his brother one beerappa got divided under Ex. P. 5 dated 8-2-1984. The suit property which is allotted to the brother of the plaintiff is sold to defendant under ex. D. 3 dated 5-9-1984 for a sum of Rs. 32,000/ -. The plaintiif entered into an agreement for purchase of the same under Ex. P. 1 dated 7-9-1984. The plaintiff has no knowledge that the consideration under ex. D. 3 is Rs. 32,000/ -. Under Ex. P. 1 the total sale consideration agreed is Rs. 95,000/-, an advance of Rs. 10,000/- was paid at the time of ex. P. 1. The sale is to he completed within 40 days from the date of Ex. P. 1 by paying the balance of consideration. The plaintiff issued notice as per Ex. P. 2 to the defendant to receive a balance of consideration and to execute the sale deed. The defendant replied as per Ex.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top