SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 297

A.V.SRINIVASA REDDY, K.L.MANJUNATH, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
BASANAGOUDA – Appellant
Versus
LAND TRIBUNAL, RALCHUK – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.JAYARAM, PRAVEEN KUMAR

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant's family consists of himself, his wife, one son and one daughter. According to appellant, there was an oral partition between himself and his minor son [sharanappa] on 13-3-1972 and subsequently that was reduced into writing in the form of a memorandum of partition [palupatti]. According to appellant, under the said petition his minor son had been allotted Sy. Nos. 86 [7 acres 21 guntas], 156 [6 acres 15 guntas], 65 [6 guntas], 66/1 [2 acres 17 guntas], 290/a [34 guntas], 293/a [1 acre 11 guntas] and 294/b [18 guntas] in all 19 acres 02 guntas; and the appellant held the remaining land viz. , Sy. Nos. 69/3 [3 acres 12 guntas], 74/2 [6 acres 20 guntas], 85 [10 acres 5 guntasj, 334 [24 guntas], 335 [34 guntas], 338 [5 acres 6 guntas] and 40 113 acres] in all 39 acres 21 guntas,

( 2 ) THE appellant filed a declaration under Section 66 of the karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 [for short, 'the Act'] in regard to the lands held by him. In the said declaration, he disclosed the total extent of lands held by him and also by his family members. According to appellant, the land which had fallen to the share of his minor son sharanappa under the partitio



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top