A.V.SRINIVASA REDDY, K.L.MANJUNATH, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
BASANAGOUDA – Appellant
Versus
LAND TRIBUNAL, RALCHUK – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant's family consists of himself, his wife, one son and one daughter. According to appellant, there was an oral partition between himself and his minor son [sharanappa] on 13-3-1972 and subsequently that was reduced into writing in the form of a memorandum of partition [palupatti]. According to appellant, under the said petition his minor son had been allotted Sy. Nos. 86 [7 acres 21 guntas], 156 [6 acres 15 guntas], 65 [6 guntas], 66/1 [2 acres 17 guntas], 290/a [34 guntas], 293/a [1 acre 11 guntas] and 294/b [18 guntas] in all 19 acres 02 guntas; and the appellant held the remaining land viz. , Sy. Nos. 69/3 [3 acres 12 guntas], 74/2 [6 acres 20 guntas], 85 [10 acres 5 guntasj, 334 [24 guntas], 335 [34 guntas], 338 [5 acres 6 guntas] and 40 113 acres] in all 39 acres 21 guntas,
( 2 ) THE appellant filed a declaration under Section 66 of the karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 [for short, 'the Act'] in regard to the lands held by him. In the said declaration, he disclosed the total extent of lands held by him and also by his family members. According to appellant, the land which had fallen to the share of his minor son sharanappa under the partitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.