SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 378

N.K.PATIL
RAJASHREE CEMENT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S.SURENDRA, Pramod N.Kathavi

N. K. PATIL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has sought for quashing the impugned demand notice dated 27th September, 2003 bearing No. RGN issued by the second respondent vide annexure A, by holding that the same is wholly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, whimsical, passed without jurisdiction, capricious and in violation of Articles 14, 19{l) (g) and Article 265 of the Constitution of India. Further, he has sought to declare that the petitioner is not liable to pay motor vehicle tax in respect of the earth moving vehicles used solely in the mining or factory areas of the petitioner and that the second respondent is not entitled to demand and levy motor vehicle tax in respect of the aforesaid earth moving vehicles. Further, the petitioner has sought for a direction, directing the respondents to refund the amount of Rs. 9. 13. 200/- along with interest.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a unit of M/s. Grasim india, a Company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the manufacture of cement in its factory situate at Aditya Nagar, Sedam, taluk, Gulbarga District. Limestone is the essential raw material required in the manufacture of cement and for the purpose of obtaining







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top