SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 553

H.G.RAMESH
MOHAMMED SALEEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
CHANDRA MOULI, Devaraju Associates

H. G. RAMESH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has sought forquashing of the order dated 13-8-2002passed by the XXIII Additional Sessions judge, Bangalore, in Spl. C. C. No. 443/ 2002 taking cognizance and issuing summons for the offences under Sections 7, 13{l) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was working as a deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and during 1996-97, he was on deputation (O. O. D.) as a Manager, Janatha Bazar, K. G. Road, Bangalore. One N. L. Gangadhar had complained to the Lokayukta Police stating that the petitioner was demanding bribe to do an official favour. A trap was laid and the case was registered by the lokayukta Police in Crime No. 3/1997 for the offences under Sections 7, 13{l) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption act. After the investigation, lokayukta placed the matter before the Government for obtaining the sanction to prosecute the petitioner. It appears that the Government refused to grant sanction to prosecute the petitioner and ordered an enquiry by the Upalokayukta by order dated 22-1-1998. The Government did not accord the sanction as required under Section 19 of th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top