SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 557

D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
VENKATARAVANAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
G.PAPI REDDY, H.B.Narayana

SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE writ petitioner is a person who had been given a vacant plot of land measuring 30x40 under the name and signature of the Block Development Officer and the Tahsildar, Srinivasapura Taluk, in terms of a site entitlement dated 20. 1. 1993. The Block Development Office and the Tahsildar were acting as a part of the Taluk House Committee constituted for the Purpose of distribution of sites to house less persons.

( 2 ) IT is in respect of such an allotment of house site that the authorities it appears have instituted further action at the instance of some disgruntled elements in the village who it appears had approached the Chairman and other persons of the Ashraya Yojane Housing Committee requesting the Committee to cancel the allotment in favour of the petitioner and to ensure that the site which had been allotted in favour of the petitioner to be retained as a play ground as the neighbouring land it appears hid been earmarked and allotted for the purpose of construction of a school building. The allotment in favour of the petitioner having been cancelled in terms of the proceedings dated 11. 4. 2001 copy at Annexure-F which was presided over by the Member











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top