SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 543

MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR
K. SRINIVASA – Appellant
Versus
KASHINATH – Respondent


Advocates:
MAHESH BABU, R.B.DESHAPANDE

MOHAN SHANTHANAGOUDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein, who is the accused in C. C. No. 26750/2003 {p. C. R. No. 323/2003) pending on the file of XIV additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate court, Bangalore has come forward with the present revision seeking for setting aside the order of issuing process and for quashing of the proceedings in the said criminal case.

( 2 ) THE records disclose that the respondent herein lodged the complaint before the court below alleging the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments act (hereinafter referred to as "act" for short) against petitioner. By the order dated 15-3-2003, the Court below ordered to issue of process against the petitioner for the said offence.

( 3 ) THE main point canvassed by learned counsel for petitioner is that the Court below has gravely erred in issuing process against the petitioner without recording the sworn statement of the complainant; and that the Court below has , on the basis of the averments made in the affidavit filed by the complainant has issued process. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the recording of sworn statement cannot be dispensed with as the same is mandat











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top