SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 41

V.GOPALA GOWDA
IREPPA THIRAKAPPA SHOURADHA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI DISTRICT, HAVERI – Respondent


Advocates:
V.GOPALA GOWDA

V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are the elected members of Town Municipal Council, savanur. They are aggrieved by the impugned order at Annexure-F, dated 30-12-2004 passed by the first respondent disqualifying their membership. The impugned order was passed on the basis of the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent against the petitioners for having disobeyed the whip of no-confidence motion against the President of the Town Municipal Council issued as per Annexures-B, B1 and B2.

( 2 ) THE impugned order is attacked on the ground that there is no specific direction in the whip issued as required under Section 3 (l) (b) of the Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1987. Consequently, there is no whip in the eye of law. In the absence of a valid whip, the impugned order is bad in law. The decisions in viswanath Kappathanavar v Channu Patil and Shobha v State Election commission , are pressed into service.

( 3 ) THE ground of attack is wholly untenable. The whip clearly states"i do hereby issue this whip of no confidence motion of Sri R. G. Sindhanur, our party nominee for the President/vice-President, T. M. C. , savanur Taluk Panchayat/cmc/town Zilla Pa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top