V.GOPALA GOWDA
FAKIRAPPA DURGAPPA HARIJAN – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GADAG SUB-DIVISION, GADAG – Respondent
( 1 ) SINCE this writ petition can be disposed of at preliminary hearing stage itself, Sri H. B. Narayan, High Court Government Pleader is directed to take notice on behalf of first respondent.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is member of 2nd respondent-Gram Panchayat. He is seeking to quash the notice of no-confidence motion at Annexure-A, dated 22-1-2005 moved against the Adhyaksha of the Gram Panchayat.
( 3 ) THIS writ petition is liable to be dismissed for several reasons. Annexure-B is the calendar of events for conducting election. The election is scheduled on 25-2-2005. The no-confidence motion is scheduled on 15-2-2005. Thus, there is hardly 10 days between the scheduled no-confidence motion meeting and elections. In view of mere 10 days gap between the two events, the petitioner should not have approached the Court. This is nothing but a frivolous and luxurious petition.
( 4 ) THE no-confidence motion is not moved against the petitioner. Hence, he cannot be the aggrieved person. The aggrieved person has not filed this writ petition. The petitioner has no locus standi to question the impugned no-confidence motion notice.
( 5 ) IF the petitioner is not in favour of n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.