SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 85

H.G.RAMESH
R. PARAMASIVAN – Appellant
Versus
T. ANASUYA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N.SUBHA READY, V.R.DATAR

H. G. RAMESH, J.

( 1 ) THIS regular first appeal is filed under Section 96 read with Order 41, cpc. This is the appeal filed by the defendants being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the VI Additional City Civil Judge, bangalore in O. S. No. 4900 of 1993 wherein the respondent herein had filed a suit for mandatory injunction. The parties are referred according to their ranking in the Court below.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff who is the respondent herein had filed the suit before the lower Court seeking for mandatory injunction and also for an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from putting up any construction or obstruction on the passage abutting the house of the defendants wherein the defendants have denied easementary right in respect of the passage of 8 ft. situate on the south-west corner of the suit schedule property running east-west to the pipeline road.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff is said to have purchased the property from one byanna in Sy. No. 37/1 of Kempapura Agrahara near Hosahalli, bangalore, a portion as shown in the sketch produced by the plaintiff, in the year 1977 wherein the plaintiff had put up construction on the said property in the year 1978


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top