S.ABDUL NAZEER
RAJOSHREE CEMENT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these petitions the question that falls for consideration is "whether passing of a Legislation by itself confers a right on the Petitioners to file a Writ Petition unless a cause of action arises thereof '?
( 2 ) PETITIONERS are Companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It is contended that they receive various notified goods from time to time from other States meant for use or ' consumption in their business. They have filed these Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 3 and 4 of the Karnataka Special Tax on Entry of Certain Goods Act, 2004, and the notifications issued thereunder in No. FD 133 CET 2004 dated 30. 09. 2004.
( 3 ) I have heard Sri G. Sarangan, Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners and Niloufer Akbar, Learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents.
( 4 ) THE State Legislature has passed a Legislation called "the Karnataka Special Tax on Entry of Certain Goods Act, 2004" (for short 'the Act') published in the Karnataka Gazette on 11th August, 2004. The said Act has been passed to provide for levy of Special Tax on Entry of Certain Goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.