SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 595

MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR
DINESH HARAKCHAND SANKLA – Appellant
Versus
KURLON LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
JAYAKUMAR S.PATIL, Joshi Associates, M.B.Ramachandra, RAO, V.P.SHINTRE

( 1 ) PETITIONER being accused No. 2 in C. C. Nos. 26054/2004. 26072/2004, 26053/2004, 26056/20 04, 26055/2004, 26073/2004, and 26071/2004, pending on the file of 14th Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, has sought for quashing the said proceedings.

( 2 ) BASED on the complaints lodged by respondent herein against the petitioner and two others alleging offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the present proceedings are initiated. The complaints disclose that the cheques issued by the accused for repayment of the legally recoverable debts due to the complainant's company, were, on presentation, returned by the concerned Bank with an endorsement of "alteration in date and drawer's signature differs". The statutory notices issued by the complainant to the petitioner herein returned with an endorsement of "not claimed". As the amounts involved in the cheques were not paid by the accused, complaints came to be filed. The principle contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner are as under : (a) Petitioner is not the partner of the 1st accused firm and that he is not involved in day-to-day affairs of the firm, (b) As the cheques are returned wi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top