SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 602

N.KUMAR
GAFARSAB ALIAS SATI GAFAR SAB – Appellant
Versus
AMEER AHMAD – Respondent


Advocates:
K.CHANDRASEKARAN, S.V.Prakash

( 1 ) THE defendant in O. S. No. 134/1985 has preferred this writ petition challenging the order dated 27-9-2004 passed on LA. No. XIII, an application filed under S. 151 of C. P. C. read with Ss. 65 and 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, rejecting the request of the petitioner to permit him to give secondary evidence in respect of the documents mentioned in the application.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration of title and for possession. The defendant is contesting the said claim and he has set up a title by himself to the schedule property on the basis of a grant certificate issued. The defendant filed I. A. XIII and sought permission of the Court to lead secondary evidence in respect of the documents mentioned therein by producing xerox copies of the same. The said application was opposed by the plaintiff. The learned trial judge has rejected the said application on the ground that the defendant has not disclosed as to when and from whom he got the xerox copies of those documents. The xerox copies of the documents are not obtained from the proper custody. The Court has to consider the question whether the documents are coming from the proper custody or not. As the d







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top