SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 784

H.V.G.RAMESH
S. PARAMESHWARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
S. CHOODAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri R.L. Patil,Sri G. Jairaj

ORDER

This revision is against the order of dismissal of the criminal appeal filed by the petitioners in No. 65/03 by the IX Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore City by order dated 28-6-2003.

2. A complaint was filed by the respondent before the XV Additional CMM, Bangalore under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which was registered in CC No. 20134 of 1999. These petitioners are arrayed as accused 2 and 7. Accused 1 is the company by name Saroj Mining Limited, Bangalore. The 1st petitioner is the Chairman and the 2nd petitioner is the Director and it is alleged that accused have borrowed loan from the complainant in a sum of Rs. 18.5 lakhs. There was also a resolution passed by the accused to clear the amount due to the complainant. The 3rd accused being the Managing Director of the accused-company, on the basis of the resolution, had issued a cheque for Rs. 20 lakhs in favour of the complainant. On presentation, the said cheque came to be dishonoured for 'insufficient funds'. After causing a legal notice demanding to pay the cheque amount, a complaint was filed for non-compliance. Thereafter, learned Magistrate who held the enquiry, convicted accused 1, 2 and
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top