SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 776

K.BHAKTHAVATSALA
SUJATHA NARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
LEELA RAMAKRISHNA – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri D.R. Sundaresha

ORDER

The petitioners/legal representatives of defendant 1 in O.S. No. 826 of 1993 on the file of the City Civil Judge at Bangalore City are before this Court challenging the common order dated 2-9-2006 made on the applications filed under Order 26, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and under Sections 11 and 18 of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 (in short, 'CFSV Act, 1958').

2. Heard Sri D.R. Sundaresh, learned Counsel for the petitioners.

3. The brief facts of the case leading to filing of the writ petition may be stated as under:

A suit was filed in O.S. No. 826 of 1993 for partition and separate possession to the extent of 1/9th share each. After the death of defendant 2 (mother of the plaintiffs), the plaintiffs amended the plaint and prayed for declaration that they are the absolute owners of item 2 of ‘A’ Schedule property and also the properties under the registered sale dated 1-7-2002 executed by their mother. After the plaint was amended, the Court below has framed nine additional issues. The 9th additional issue reads as under ''Is the Court fee paid is insufficient".


4. After the plaintiff filed affidavit by, way of evidence, the present pet





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top