SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 613

AJIT J.GUNJAL
A. V. N. PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SITA BAI RAJ PUROHIT – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri V. Padmanabha Kedilaya,Sri Venkatesh for Sri R.B. Deshpande

JUDGMENT

Even though the matter is listed for admission, with consent, it is taken up for final hearing.

2. During the course of this judgment, the parties would be referred to with reference to their rankings in the Trial Court.

3. The plaintiff has filed the suit against the defendant seeking relief of declaration to the effect that he is the owner of the suit property measuring 1'6" North-South and 67' East-West and for possession of the same from the defendant and also for the relief of mandatory injunction directing her to remove the construction which is put up on the suit property. It is the case of the plaintiff that he is the owner in possession of the house bearing Municipal No. 7/6/224 situate at Tawahar Nagar, KH.B. Colony, Raichur. The said property was allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (for short, 'KHB') in his favour on lease-cum-sale basis. He has put up a construction. The house has been constructed by the plaintiff on site bearing No.5 allotted by the KHB. The defendant has been allotted a house constructed on site No.4. The house of the defendant is situate on the Southern side of the plaintiffs house. In the month of November 1984 the defendant constructed













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top