SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 428

N.KUMAR, CYRIAC JOSEPH
AZEEZ KHAN – Appellant
Versus
BADRUNISSA BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Sri R. Sudarshan, Advocate for Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Cyriac Joseph, C.J. (Oral):

The appellant is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 15223 of 2005. When the notice issued to the respondent in the writ petition could not be served in the normal course, the appellant filed I.A. No. I of 2006 seeking permission to take out notice to the respondent by publication in the newspaper "Daily Pas ban". The said application was allowed by the learned Single Judge on 5-1-2006 subject to the direction that the notice should be taken out by paper publication in "Vijaya Kamataka" daily. Thereupon the appellant filed LA. No. III of 2006 praying for modification of the order dated 5-1-2006. In I.A. No. III of 2006, the appellant prayed that he may be permitted to take out notice by paper publication in "Daily Pasban" instead of "Vijaya Karnataka". The said application for modification was rejected by the learned Single Judge on 8-2-2006. Aggrieved by the said order dated 8-2-2006 rejecting I.A. No. III of 2006, the appellant has filed this writ appeal.

2. The contention of the appellant is that the learned Single Judge ought to have allowed the writ petitioner/appellant to take out notice to the respondent by paper publication in "Daily Pas ba









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top