R.GURURAJAN
ADMAR MUTT, UDUPI – Appellant
Versus
RAMA SHETTY (DEAD) BY L. RS – Respondent
Petitioner is before me challenging the order of the Land Tribunal dated 29-1-2003, Annexure-J in the case on hand.
Facts in brief are as under:
Sri Rama Shetty, was a tenant of several lands. However, he was not a tenant of land measuring 14 acres 13 cents in Sy. No. 48/2; 3 acres 21 cents in Sy. No. 347/1. He was also not the tenant of 3 acres in Sy. No. 347/1,21 cents in Sy. No. 46/5A, 24 cents in Sy. No. 31/5A, 1 cent in Sy.
No. 46/1. This petition is confined to the lands in 14 acres 13 cents in Sy.
No. 48/2, 2 acres 32 cents in Sy. No. 347/1, 68 cents in Sy. No. 347/1,21 cents in Sy. No. 46/5A, 24 cents in Sy. No. 31/5A, 1 cent in Sy. No. 46/1.
Rama Shetty is no more and he is represented by his legal representatives respondents 1 to 7. Rama Shetty filed Form 7 seeking occupancy rights in respect of 26 lands situated in Shivalli Village. In that Form 7 he had claimed 4 acres 13 cents in Sy. No. 48/2, 3 acres 21 cents in Sy. No. 347/1 only. However, he had not claimed in that Form 7 Sy. No. 46/5A and Sy. No. 31/5A, however he had only claimed 3 acres 21 cents in Sy. No. 347. He had also not claimed 14 acres 13 cents in Sy. No. 48/2 but had only claimed 4 acres 13 cents. He had
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.