SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 665

D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
CHIKKUSAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri D.L.N. Rao, Senior Counsel for M/s. Law Associates, Advocates for Petitioners in W.P. Nos. 4750, 2028, 4751, 4752, 4753, 4803, 5271, 5283, 6391, 2026 and 16211 of 2005;
Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, Senior Counsel for M/s. Guha Associates and Narender G., Advocates for Petitioner in W.P. No. 4800 of 2005;
Sri S.V. Bhat, Advocate for Petitioner in W.P. No. 4854 of 2005;
M/s. Ranga Ramu Associates, Advocates for Petitioner in W.P. No. 6624 of 2005;
Sri M.M. Swamy, Advocate for Petitioners in W.P. Nos. 5151, 12395 and 15457 of 2005; Smt. Suman Hegde, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents in all writ petitions.

ORDER

In all these petitions, petitioners are persons who claim ownership of agricultural lands located at different places, one such being at Rechamballi Village, presently, Chamarajanagar District which is also described as an erstwhile old Mysore area and such lands which are described as patta lands and the owners of such lands being also known as 'pattadars'.

2. It is the admitted position that all petitioners are carrying on quarrying activities which does amount to mining operation as understood under the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short, 'MMDR Act'), Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 as also the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

3. Petitioners who extract the mineral, particularly, black granite or the pink granite from the quarries, after cutting boulders and rocks into requisite size, want to transport the same to a port wherefrom it is being exported to foreign countries. Such transportation is governed by Rule 42 of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 and necessary application for securing what is known as the mineral dispatch permit in Form MDP had been made by the petitioners. It is in the pro
































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top