SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 479

K.SREEDHAR RAO
KEYGIEN GLOBAL LIMITED, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
MADRA V IMPEX, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
M/s. Kamath and Kamath, Advocates for Appellant;
Sri S. Shekar Shetty, Advocate for Respondents.

JUDGMENT

The complainant supplied certain quantity of readymade garments to the respondent-accused. The accused towards the value of the garments supplied, issued cheque-Ex. P. 3. The cheque on presentation is dishonoured. Statutory notice is issued and private complaint is filed. Per contra, the accused submits that the goods delivered were defective and not upto the standards agreed. Therefore, the entire bulk has been rejected and returned to the complainant. The accused states that in view of the rejection of the bulk, the accused does not incur any liability to honour the cheque. The Trial Court upheld the defence contention and acquitted the accused.

2. It is admitted that cheque was issued in respect of supply of readymade garments. On delivery, it is found that goods were defective and not according to specifications. Hence, the accused rejected and returned the goods. It is admitted that accused has not appropriated the goods supplied by the complainant. If the rejection of the goods by the accused is illegal, the complainant has remedy to sue for damages but, has no right to seek value of the rejected and returned goods. The cheque is obviously issued in respect of reject


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top