K.SREEDHAR RAO
KEYGIEN GLOBAL LIMITED, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
MADRA V IMPEX, BANGALORE – Respondent
The complainant supplied certain quantity of readymade garments to the respondent-accused. The accused towards the value of the garments supplied, issued cheque-Ex. P. 3. The cheque on presentation is dishonoured. Statutory notice is issued and private complaint is filed. Per contra, the accused submits that the goods delivered were defective and not upto the standards agreed. Therefore, the entire bulk has been rejected and returned to the complainant. The accused states that in view of the rejection of the bulk, the accused does not incur any liability to honour the cheque. The Trial Court upheld the defence contention and acquitted the accused.
2. It is admitted that cheque was issued in respect of supply of readymade garments. On delivery, it is found that goods were defective and not according to specifications. Hence, the accused rejected and returned the goods. It is admitted that accused has not appropriated the goods supplied by the complainant. If the rejection of the goods by the accused is illegal, the complainant has remedy to sue for damages but, has no right to seek value of the rejected and returned goods. The cheque is obviously issued in respect of reject
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.