SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 364

In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
(Division Bench)
S.R. Nayakand V. Jagannathan, JJ.
B.A. Kagali And Another
V
The Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare, Bangalore And Others
Writ Appeal No. 3769 of 2003 (GM-R/C) connected with Writ Appeal No. 3771 of 2003 (GM-R/C).
20th June, 2005

Advocates appeared:
Sri Pramod N. Kathavi and Sri B. Pramod, Advocates for Appellants in both W.As;
Sri Deshraj, Government Advocate for Respondents-1 to 4 in both W.As;
Sri Ravi Malimath, Advocate for Respondent-5 in both W.As;
Sri B.V. Acharya, Senior Counsel for Sri H.T. Nagaraja, Advocate for Respondent-6 in both W.As.

Marriage to a member of a Scheduled Tribe and permanent residency in the relevant district can establish Scheduled Tribe status under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. Challenges to caste status must demonstrate bona fide and cannot be vexatious.

Headnote:

Scheduled Tribe - Caste Verification - Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 - The judgment discusses the validity of the caste status of Smt. Ramani, who claimed to belong to the Scheduled Tribe 'Kuruba' from Coorg District. The court upheld Smt. Ramani's Scheduled Tribe status based on her marriage to a Kuruba from Coorg District and her permanent residency, and dismissed the writ appeals.

Fact of the Case:

Smt. Ramani, a 'Kuruba' by caste, claimed Scheduled Tribe status under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. After facing challenges to her caste status, she filed writ petitions seeking relief. The court heard the petitions together and dismissed the writ appeals filed by the appellants, upholding Smt. Ramani's Scheduled Tribe status.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that Smt. Ramani acquired the status of a permanent resident of Coorg District by marrying a Kuruba from the district and residing there from 1977 onwards. The court also deemed the challenges to Smt. Ramani's caste status as lacking bona fide and vexatious.

Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of Smt. Ramani's Scheduled Tribe status, the cancellation of her caste certificate, and the fairness of the proceedings before the Caste Verification Committee and Divisional Commissioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Smt. Ramani's marriage to a Kuruba from Coorg District and her permanent residency established her Scheduled Tribe status. It also ruled that the challenges to her caste status lacked bona fide and were vexatious. The court found the cancellation of her caste certificate and the proceedings before the Caste Verification Committee and Divisional Commissioner to be unfair and without authority of law.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ appeals, upholding Smt. Ramani's Scheduled Tribe status and finding no grounds to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. No costs were awarded to either party.

JUDGMENT

In these two writ appeals the correctness of the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17th April, 2003 in W.P. No. 24736 of 2001 and W.P. Nos. 24395 and 24396 of 2000 is assailed. The sixth respondent herein, viz., Smt. Ramani is the writ petitioner in W.P. No. 24736 of 2001. Smt. Ramani is a 'Kuruba' by caste barn outside Coorg District. In the year 1977, she was married to one HT. Devaraj, a kuruba by birth, residing at Dechoor, Madikeri in Coorg District. In terms of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, the husband of Smt. Ramani is a Scheduled Tribe an account of the being a 'Kuruba' from Coorg District. There is no controversy between the parties that the husband of Smt. Ramani and two children born out of the wedlock belong to Scheduled Tribe in terms of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. In the year 1981 Smt. Ramani applied to the Tahsildar, Madikeri, for a certificate to the effect that she belongs to Scheduled Tribe she being a 'Kuruba' and resident of Coorg District. The Tahsildar after due verification of the facts issued a certificate dated 14-3-1981, certifying that Smt. Ramani belongs to Scheduled Tribe under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. When the matter stood thus, Smt. Ramani applied to the post of lecturer in Physics in the general merit category in response to an advertisement issued by the Bangalore University in the year 1983. After the selection process she was selected and appointed to the post of lecturer in Physics in the general merit category and she accordingly joined the service in the year 1983. When she was serving as a lecturer in Physics in the University, the Bangalore University called for applications to fill up a post of Reader in Physics reserved for Scheduled Tribe category by way of direct recruitment. Smt. Ramani applied for the said post and she was appointed as Reader in Physics against the Scheduled Tribe quota with effect from 20th February, 1989. Subsequently, Smt. Ramani was appointed to the post of Professor of Physics by way of promotion with effect from 14-11-1997.

2. The trouble started in the year 1998 when Smt. Ramani was selected for Professor's post in selection grade and the Syndicate which confirmed the said appointment, however, referred the issue relating to caste status of Smt. Ramani to the Caste Verification Committee, Coorg District. The Caste Verification Committee, by its proceedings dated 3-6-1999, has opined that Smt. Ramani is not entitled to the caste certificate claimed by her. Being aggrieved by the said proceedings of the Caste Verification Committee Smt. Ramani preferred an appeal to the Divisional Commissioner, Mysore who dismissed that appeal by order dated 25-10-1989. When the matter stood thus, the appellants herein filed W.P. Nos. 24395 and 24396 of2000 praying for a writ of mandamus to respondents 1 to 5 therein to initiate action and prosecute Smt. Ramani as per the provisions of Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, etc. Act, 1990 and Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 1997. During the pendency of these two writ petitions, the Tahsildar, Madikeri, placing reliance on the order of the Caste Verification Committee dated 3-6-1999 and that of the Divisional Commissioner, Mysore, dated 25-10-1999, without notice to Smt. Ramani, passed an order on 11-6-2001 cancelling the Caste Certificate earlier issued to her. Smt. Ramani being aggrieved by the said order of the Tahsildar dated 11-6-2001 preferred W.P. No. 24736 of 2001. In the said writ petition Smt. Ramani has also assailed the validity of the order of the Caste Verification Committee dated 3-6-1999 and that of the Divisional Commissioner, Mysore dated 25-10-1999. The two writ petitions filed by the appellants herein and the writ petition filed by Smt. Ramani were clubbed and heard toget












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top