SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 689

2007(4) Kar. L.J. 645 (DB)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
(DIVISION BENCH)
H.L DATTU AND H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS, JJ.
DATTAPRASAD CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED, BANGALORE AND OTHERS - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 3883 of 2003
(Writ Appeal Nos. 3883 to 3886 of 2003).
Decided on : 17th November, 2005

Advocates appeared
Smt. Jayashree Bhat for Sri S.G. Bhat, Advocate for Appellants.
Sri A.G. Shivanna, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent.

Headnote:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 116 - Interim bond - Seeking of - Exercise of power by Magistrate in this behalf. [Mohan Shantanagoudar, J]: Under sub-Section (3) of Section 116 of Cr.P.C., a power has been conferred on the Magistrate to ask for interim bond with or without sureties to keep peace pending completion of the enquiry. This power is used if the Magistrate considers that immediate measures are necessary for the prevention of breach of peace or commission or disturbance of public tranquillity. He does so for reasons to be recorded in writing and if the person does not execute such bond, the Magistrate is empowered to detain him in custody till the bond is executed or enquiry is concluded After completion of enquiry, final order would be passed under Section 117 of Cr.P.C.

       Cases Referred: 1973(1) SC Reports 738.

H.L. Dattu, J.

JUDGMENT

The appellants before us are all House Building Co-operative Societies and they are registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, read with Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960. They are calling in question the correctness or otherwise of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos. 23564 to 23567 of 2001, dated 17-3-2003 Wattaprasad Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Bangalore and Others v State of Karnataka.

2. The appellants in the writ petitions had sought for the following relief. It is as under:

"to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash Section 5 of the Karnataka Act 6 of 2001, amending Section 38 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1959), by inserting proviso at the end as unconstitutional".

3. The learned Single ,Judge after considering the rival contentions of the parties to the lis, has rejected the writ petitions by his order dated 17..3-2003. It is that order which is called in question in the present appeal.

4. At the time of hearing of this appeal, the parties to the appeal have filed memos before this Court. The memo filed by the State Government dated 17-11-2005, which is signed by the Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department and also by Sri Shivanna, learned Additional Government Advocate, reads as under:

"MEMO

In the above writ appeals the appellants have challenged the order of the learned Single Judge upholding the validity of insertion of proviso to Section 38 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 withdrawing the exemptions from the compulsory registration of instruments which are intended to transfer or in effect transfer the right, title or interest in immovable property executed by or in favour of House Building Co-operative Societies registered under the Co-operative Societies Act. The above said insertion was effected by Act No.6 of 2001, with effect from 1-4-2001. The object and reasons to introduce the amendment are clearly reflected in the budget speech by the then Chief Minister/Finance Minister as excerpted below.-

"213. To encourage co-operative activities in the State, registration of documents executed by or in favour of Co-operative Societies are exempted under Section 38 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. It has been observed that of late some House Building Co-operative Societies are misusing this provision. A person who buys property is not given title deed, but is made a shareholder of the Society, due to which the Government is losing huge revenue. Therefore, it is proposed to amend Section 38 of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, to make all such instruments compulsorily registerable under Section 17(1) of the Registration Act, 1908",

Therefore, from the date of amendment, the registration of documents is made compulsory in respect of instruments which are intended to transfer or in effect, transfer the right, title or interest in the immovable property executed by or in favour of House Building Co-operative Societies registered under the Co-operative Societies Act."

5. In view of the memo filed by the State Government, the appellants also have filed a memo signed by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants dated 17-11-2005. It reads as under:

"Memo on behalf of appellants

(1) In the writ petitions appellant-societies challenged the amendment to Section 38 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 by Section 5 of Karnataka Act 6 of 2001 which came into force on 1-4-2001.

(2) During the pendency of the writ petitions and the writ appeals there was no interim order and the appellant-societies and their members have accepted the amendments for transactions subsequent to 1-4-2001.

(3) At the time of hearing of the above appeals on behalf of the respondents it was submitted that the amendment is prospective with effect from 1-4-2001 and also that Section 38 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act is a valid legislation and gover









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top