Though the matter is listed for admission, with the consent of the learned Counsel for both the parties, these petitions are heard and disposed of by this Court by a common order.

2. The petitioner and respondents are one and the same and the revision petitioner in both the cases challenges the order of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mangalore and confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore.

3. For the sake of convenience and also to avoid repetition of facts, both petitions are taken up together and disposed of by a common order.

4. The petitioner in both the cases is an accused in C.C. Nos. 60 and 61 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate First Class-V, Mangalore. The Trial Court after considering the materials placed on record by both the parties convicted the revision petitioner in both the cases directed him to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- in each case within a period of three months. In default of payment of compensation, she shall undergo imprisonment for a period of 30 days and the said order of conviction and sentence passed in both the cases by t