SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 469

AJIT J.GUNJAL
SWEETY E. M. – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR K. B. – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Sri K Giridhar. Advocate for Petitioner;
M/s. P.V. Vasudevan and Associates, Advocates for Respondent.

ORDER

Even though this matter is listed for preliminary hearing, with consent it is taken up for final disposal.

This petition is filed questioning the order passed by the Principal Family Court Judge in M.C. No. 508 of 2007 dismissing the application filed jointly by both the petitioner and respondent under Section 14( 1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, 'the Act') seeking exemption in filing the consent petition under Section 13-B of the Act within one year of the marriage.

2. Smt. Sweety E.M. W/o Sri Sunil Kumar KB. and Sri Sunil Kumar KB. filed a petition under Section 13-B of the Act read with Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent. Since the petition was filed prior to the expiry of one year from the date of the marriage i.e., 31-10-2006, both the petitioner and respondents filed an application under Section 14(1) of the Act to exempt passage of one year for filing the mutual consent petition. The learned Judge rejected the said application.

3. The relevant portion of Section 14(1) reads as under:

"14. No petition for divorce to be presented within one year of marriage.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top