H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS
RENUKA – Appellant
Versus
TAMMANNA – Respondent
In this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 2-12-2005 in O.S. No. 129 of 2003 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ranebennur allowing LA. No. 14 filed under Order 26, Rule 10-A of the CPC appointing Dr. Syed Husain, Director, Centre for DNA (Finger Printing Diagnosis), ECIL Road, Nacharama, Hyderabad-500 076 as expert Commissioner to conduct the DNA test by obtaining blood samples of plaintiff, defendant 4 and his wife Smt. Geetha Reddy.
2. Petitioner is the plaintiff. Respondents are the defendants before the Trial Court in O.S. No. 129 of 2003. The parties in this writ petition are referred to their status before the Trial Court.
3. Plaintiff filed O.S. No. 129 of 2003 against the defendants to declare that she is the daughter of late Sri Ramakrishna and his wife Smt. Lalitha and for other reliefs. The defendants filed written statement denying the claim of plaintiff and contended that plaintiff is the daughter of one Sri Narayana and his wife Smt. Geetha Reddy. After completion of pleadings the Trial Court framed the issues and when the matter was set down for evidence, the first defendant filed LA.
Smt. Kamti Devi and Another v Poshi Ram, AIR 2001 SC 2226: (2001)5 SCC 301 : 2001 SCC (Cri.) 892
Surya Dev Rai v Ram Chander Rai and Others, AIR 2003 SC 3044 : (2003)6 SCC 675
Goutam Kundu State of West Bengal and Another, AIR 1993 SC 2295 : (1993)3 SCC 418
Banarasi Dass v Mrs. Teeku Dutta and Another, ILR 2005 Kar. 3271 (SC) : (2005)4 SCC 449
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.