N.K. Patil, J.

Petitioner - party-in-person has sought for a direction, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner employee with all benefits and full payments of arrears of salary. Further, petitioner - party-in-person has questioned the correctness of the order dated 24th November 2006 on the file of the Member, Educational Appellate Tribunal and Principal District Judge, Belgaum in E.A.T. No.5/l991 vide Annexure-B. Petitioner has also sought for grant of exemplary cost to first respondent - Management for dismissing the petitioner, resulting in stigma on the character of the petitioner.

2. The undisputed facts of the case are that, petitioner-party-in- person, had earlier filed W.P.No.17108/2005 assailing the correctness of the order dated 18th June 2005 passed by the Educational Appellate Tribunal, Belgaum in E.A.T.No.5/1991 vide Annexure-B to the said writ petition. The said writ petition had come up for consideration before this Court on 20th January 2006 and this Court, after considering the oral and documentary evidence and other relevant material available on file, allowed the writ petition filed by petitioner - party-in-person and quashed the impugned o