SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 485

V.JAGANNATHAN
IMAMHUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
JANNATBI – Respondent


Advocates appearing for
Appellant: G. Balakrishna Shastry, Adv.
Respondent: Ravikumar D. Gokakar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

V. Jagannathan, J.

The fifth defendant before the Trial Court is the appellant herein and he is aggrieved by the lower Appellate Court reversing the judgment of the Trial Court inasmuch as whereas the Trial Court dismissed the suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs, the lower Appellate Court reversed the same by allowing the appeal filed by the respondents-plaintiffs and decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs for separate possession of their 1/4th share in the suit property. Hence, this second appeal.

2. The facts in brief are to the effect that the respondents-plaintiffs filed the suit for separate possession of their 1/4th share in the suit property by contending that they were the legal heirs of deceased Jangusaheb and following the death of said Jangusaheb, respondents 1 to 6, being the wife (plaintiff 1) and children (plaintiffs 2 to 6), filed the said suit for the above said relief. The said suit was contested by the defendants by taking up the stand that Jangusaheb did not marry the first plaintiff Jannatbi and the name of the first plaintiff is Ningavva, a Hindu belonging to Maratha community and, therefore, there was no marriage having taken place between the fir




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top