SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 1086

K.RAMANNA
DURGAPPA FAKIRAPPA HOLER, BANI – Appellant
Versus
BHEMAPPA BASAPPA BHAJANTRI – Respondent


K. RAMANNA, J.

( 1 ) M. F. A 5967/2001 has been filed by the appellants/original land owners under Section 54 (1) r/w. Section 30 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act challenging the Judgment and Award passed by the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn. ). , Bagalkot on 30-8-2001 in L. A. C. No. 228/ 2000 whereby the reference Court has apportioned the compensation awarded by respondent No. 2 at the rate of 25% and 75%.

( 2 ) M. F. A Cr. Ob 22/2002 has been filed by the Cross-Objector/ Anubhavadhar challenging the judgment and Award dated 30-8-2001 passed in L. A. C. No. 228/2000 by the II Additional Civil judge (Sr. Dn ). , Bagalkot on 30-8-2001, in so far as not awarding remaining 25% of compensation amount and to modify that this cross objector is entitled to receive the entire amount of compensation awarded.

( 3 ) THE brief facts leading to M. F. A. NO. 5967/2001 are that the appellants were the owners of the property bearing T. P. No. 262-H, measuring 69. 89 sq mtrs situate at Ward No. 10, Bagalkot. The first respondent herein was a tenant paying monthly rent and he was in possession of the aforesaid property. Originally, the Government has granted 69. 89 sq. mts of land to the anc










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top