SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 107

S.R.NAYAK, K.RAMANNA
ASHOK KUMAR P. – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful writ petitioner feeling aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge dated November 21, 1998 in W. P. No. 14136/1991 has come up with this writ appeal. Learned Judge by the order under appeal has dismissed the writ petition. The above writ petition was preferred by the appellant herein calling in question the action of the Management dated june 19, 1991 (Annexure-D) by which he was reverted to the post of Assistant Traffic Manager (Class-II) from the post of Divisional Traffic Officer (Class-I Jr.)- The background facts be noted briefly and they are as follows: the appellant-writ petitioner and the fourth-respondent belong to the Schedule Caste community. Both of them were selected for the post of Assistant Traffic Manager (Class-II) in the year 1985 and subsequently they were appointed to the said post in the year 1986. The appellant was confirmed in the post on completion of probation on April 21, 1988 whereas respondent No. 4 was confirmed in the post on December 7, 1988. When the matter stood thus, on October 26, 1989, the management published a provisional seniority list of Assistant Traffic manager (Gr. II) and Divisional Traffic








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top