SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 821

B.PADMARAJ
SMT. SHEETAWWA – Appellant
Versus
HEMAREDDI – Respondent


PADMARAJ, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the arguments of the learned Counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the relevant case papers including the impugned judgment passed by the Trial Court. The learned counsel for the respondent being absent and there being no representation on his behalf, he could not be heard in the matter. Even in the absence of the learned Counsel for the respondent, the learned Counsel for the appellant took me in detail through the pleadings, the evidence and the impugned judgment of the Trial Court.

( 2 ) THIS appeal by the defendant Smt. Sheetawwa is directed against the judgment and decree of the Trial Court dated 24. 1. 2000 whereby and where under the Trial Court has decreed the suit of the respondent-plaintiff with costs directing the appellant-defendant to execute the registered sale deed after receiving the remaining sale consideration amount and that if, the defendant fails to execute the registered sale deed, the plaintiff is at liberty to get the sale deed executed through the process of the Court by appointment of a Commissioner. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court found that the only question to be considered in the case is whether it is a sa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top