2002 Supreme(Kar) 466
Karnataka High Court
Judges : G.C.Bharuka,K.Sreedhar Rao
PIONEER ENTERPRISES - Appellant
Versus
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS) - Respondent
STRP 46 Of 2001
Decided On : 07/26/2002
The central legal point established in the judgment is the classification of T. V. antenna as an accessory and the determination of the applicable tax rate under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Headnote:
T. V. antenna - Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Section 12-A, Notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (X) dated March 28, 1987, Notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (V) dated March 28, 1987, Notification no. FD 46 CSL 86 dated June 20, 1986, Notification No. FD 32 CSL 86 (27) dated March 26, 1986 - The court discussed the applicability of different notifications under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 and determined the tax rate for T. V. antenna, classifying it as an accessory and not a component of T. V. set.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a manufacturer of T. V. antenna, contested the revised tax assessment at six per cent under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, arguing that the antenna should be taxed at three or four per cent as a T. V. component or accessory.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the assessing officer's decision, ruling that the T. V. antenna is an accessory and not a component of the T. V. set, and therefore, the six per cent tax levy was correct and legal.
Issues: (1) Whether the T. V. antenna is an inseparable component of T. V. or an accessory? (2) Whether the assessing officer was right in levying sales tax at six per cent based on the notification No. FD 32 CSL 87 (V) March 28, 1987?
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the T. V. antenna is an accessory based on its use for enhanced efficiency of the T. V. set, and upheld the legality of the six per cent tax levy under the applicable notifications.
Final Decision: The revision petitions were dismissed by the court.
( 1 ) THESE revisions are filed against the impugned order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in s. T. A. Nos. 132 of 1998, 133 of 1998, 134 of 1998 and 135 of 1998. The petitioner is a manufacturer of T. V. antenna. The assessing officer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, for the assessment year 1987-88 levied the tax at three per cent based on the Government notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (X) dated March 28, 1987, on the total turnover, by his order dated February 13, 1990. However, by an order dated September 1, 1994 under Section 12-A of the KST Act, revised the assessments and levied tax at six per cent based on the Notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (V) dated March 28, 1987. The assessing officer revised the assessment orders for the years 1987-88 to 1991-92 holding that the tax at the rate of six per cent as per the notification dated FD 34 CSL 87 (V) dated March 28, 1987 is applicable and that the T. V. antenna do not constitute an item of T. V. component and it is only an accessory.
( 2 ) IT is pertinent to note that the notification issued under the Sales Tax Act; vide Notification no. FD 46 CSL 86 dated June 20, 1986 discriminatory tax rate was applied to T. V. sets and components manufactured in Karnataka and outside Karnataka. The T. V. sets and components manufactured in Karnataka attracted concessional rate only at two per cent and again revised to three per cent as per Notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (X) dated March 28, 1987 and from time to time revised and was fixed at four per cent vide Notification No. FD 32 CSL 86 (27) dated March 26, 1986. Under section 5 of the KST Act, 1957 by Notification No. FD 32 CSL 86 (27) dated march 26, 1986 in respect of Schedule items the sales tax at the rate of four per cent was imposed. Again by an amended Notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (V) dated March 28, 1987 the sales tax imposed under Notification No. FD 32 CSL 86 (27) dated March 26, 1986 was increased to six per cent in Solidaire India Ltd. v. State of Karnataka reported in [1994] 92 STC 278 ; (1991) 35 KLJ Tribunal Suppl. 246, this Court has struck down the Notification No. FD 32 csl 86 (27) dated March 26, 1986 levying differential rates of sales tax for the goods manufactured in Karnataka and outside Karnataka as being illegal.
( 3 ) IT is the contention of the petitioner that uniform rate of sales tax on the antenna, as a T. V. component should be at the rate of three per cent and levy of tax at six per cent is illegal, in alternate contends that T. V. antenna is only accessory and it has to be levied at four per cent.
( 4 ) THE Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Appeals-cum-the first appellate authority upheld the order made by the assessing officer under Section 12-A of the KST Act holding that the T. V. antenna is an accessory and that the Notification No. FD 32 CSL 86 (27) dated March 26, 1986 read with Notification No. FD 34 CSL 87 (V) dated March 28, 1987 is applicable and the rate of tax is to be at six per cent. Being aggrieved, the appeals were filed before the karnataka Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the view of the assessing officer that the t. V. antenna is only an accessory and not a component of the T. V. set and the rate of tax should be at six per cent and not four per cent as contended and dismissed the appeals. Being aggrieved by the said dismissal, the present revisions are filed under Section 23 (1) of the KST Act.
( 5 ) THE following questions of law emerge from the disputed contentions raised in these proceedings :
" (1) Whether the T. V. antenna is an inseparable component of T. V. or an accessory ? (2) Whether the assessing officer was right in levying sales tax at six per cent based on the notification No. FD 32 CSL 87 (V) March 28, 1987 ?"
The counsel for the petitioners relied on the long list of the following decisions to impress upon the point that the T. V. antenna is not an accessory and a component : (1) The decision of the Supreme Court in Union C