( 1 ) IN all these revision petitions, the petitioner is assailing the validity and legality of the impugned order dated 27. 9. 2001 passed by the Principal District Judge-cum-Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, No. 1, Bellary.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are that the respondents herein filed the claim petitions before the motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for compensation towards the injuries suffered by them in the accident occurred at Beldota Minas Cross, near Mariyammanahalli on 27. 6. 1997 at 7 a. m. while they were travelling in a K. S. R. T. C. bus bearing registration No. MEF 7452. The further case of petitioner is that claimants have failed to examine themselves in support of their case and the wound certificates pertaining to the injuries suffered by them were produced by the claimants in the MVC cases. The amount of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal is not justifiable. Assailing the correctness of the common order passed by the Tribunal, the petitioner has presented these revision petitions before this court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil procedure.

( 3 ) THE principal submission of learned Counsel appearing for petitioner in thes